![]() |
| Image credit: Goodreads |
Jumping back onto the 1001 bandwagon after a brief interlude, I have to
admit that the ride proved to be rather bumpy with this week’s chosen book in
the driver’s seat. I was taken to a disturbingly (and sometimes hilariously)
fragile place –the interior of an American teen’s mind- as we navigated the
‘phony’ world of the white middle and upper class in The Catcher in the Rye.
Universally hailed as the quintessential book of teenage angst –so much
so that it was graphically referenced in that ‘Emo Kid’ song from about a
decade ago- The Catcher in the Rye is
a mock autobiography written from the point of view of American teenager, Holden
Caulfield, whom has just been expelled from another prep school. Running away to
New York to kill some time before facing his folks, Holden flits from place to
place on a seemingly impulsive and completely direction-less path that ends up
leading right back to where he started.
I can absolutely understand why this book is a part of the classic
literature canon. There are many things about it that make it hugely memorable
and provocative. The first person register and the fact that it’s written in a
very nonchalant, colloquial voice gives us a real sense of character -reminiscent of A Clockwork Orange- whilst simultaneously highlighting Salinger’s
satirical streak.
My guess is that this book is canonical because of the many ways in which
you can interpret it, especially the narrator. Whilst it’s not even two hundred
pages long, The Catcher in the Rye is
a veritable rollercoaster of compulsion and confusion, especially regarding the
narrator. On more than one occasion, I found myself questioning whether Holden
was clinically depressed, suffering from PTSD, or just off his tits the entire
time. Is he really smoking cigarettes or ‘cigarettes’ for two days, is the
world really as phony as he believes, or is he just another classic unreliable
narrator like those from Poe? These questions don’t really get answered –or if
they do it’s more or less hand-waved aside- and it’s this trick that establishes the book’s unique reading experience.
![]() |
| Image credit: The Guardian |
What’s even more fascinating is that Salinger doesn’t seem to have any
love for his protagonist and the little mishaps that happen to him on his
journey serve as a nice slice of ‘serves you right’ cake. It’s very hard to
like Holden, mainly because of the fact that you’re on your toes about how much
of what he tells you is true. Heck, even Holden doesn’t hold himself in high
regard! The book is filled with various self-deprecations and even apocalyptic
anxieties/fantasies, perfectly communicating those lost, directionless, and
rebellious feels of adolescence. While I don’t believe that all teenagers go
through that heavy level of angst, it’s certainly something that we can all
identify and empathise with.
The Catcher in the Rye is certainly a significant piece of literature,
one that although I didn’t necessarily adore, I definitely appreciated. Having
now finally read it I can better understand its references and allusion in
popular culture and appreciate the many interpretations that people have of it.
Author: J. D. Salinger, 1945-46
Published: First published by
Little Brown & Co. (Boston) in 1951


No comments:
Post a Comment