![]() |
Image credit: Wikipedia |
Creator signatures and styles are something that I always find
fascinating in both film and literature. That excited spark of recognition as
you see something from an author or director that is similar to their other
works is a stamp or a token that –because you recognise it- gains you entry
into this community of fandom and a certain deeper relationship with the
creator.
There was definitely a large bit of that sort of thing happening this
week, as I sat down and read Stephen King’s The
Dark Half.
The book tells the story of writer, (classic King protagonist) Thaddeus
Beaumont who has been publishing novels under two names and recently come out
and laid his pseudonym to rest –literally. After a staged, metaphoric burial
for the author formerly known as George Stark, a series of grizzly murders
begin to happen. While the fashion of the murders is like something out of one
of Stark’s novels, the real clincher is the fingerprints left at the scene:
Thad’s. Suddenly Thad and his family are in very real danger, as it appears
that Thad’s pseudonym has come to life and is intent on hunting down Thad in
the hopes of forcing him to write him back into existence.
Straight away, the idea is very Stephen King right? A mixture of the
scientific (though sometimes it feels like you need to suspend your belief a
little bit) and supernatural, The Dark
Half is an interesting exploration into the creative mental cavities of the
writer’s mind as well as being something of a metaphor for irrational
jealousies that can come with art, namely this idea that audiences can love the
characters or the works you create under a false name more than the ones that
are ‘truly’ you. I imagine there’s a fine, mental tightrope being walked in
those cases, especially when it comes to fans of series. King explored this
idea of ‘Sherlock Holmes Syndrome’ in Misery
where the ‘number 1 fan’ of Paul Sheldon become none-too-friendly when she
realised he’d killed off her favourite character. While The Dark Half levels up and makes the pseudonym both the villain
and the catalyst for the narrative events, the idea of creator fragility and
fan pressure stands starkly evident, driving the story and providing all of the
drama.
![]() |
Image credit: Yankee Magazine |
While the idea itself is very interesting and enough to inspire readers
to open the cover and dive into the world within, The Dark Half is far from one of the best of King’s works. While
there is a level of fun in recognising author’s signatures in their characters
or narrative tones, there’s also a level of ‘ugh, this again’, which can lead
to a little bit of a soiled reading experience. There were many, many parts to
this novel that made me groan and feel like it was a little bit too Stephen
King. A few unique, but pretentious phrases here and there, a not so cohesive
blend of science and supernatural, and blunt descriptions of graphic violence
that characterised the scene, but didn’t really offer much else. In certain
areas the prose feels clunky and somewhat forced, but to be fair one can argue
that this gives the tale a certain sort of symmetry, mentally reflecting the
fractured creative states of the two writers… though this is a thin argument.
Ultimately I enjoyed The Dark Half
fine; it was an interesting idea that was succinctly transformed into a
visually vibrant piece of literature, but some of King’s signature tricks and
traits have a tendency to break the spell of voyeurism and bring you back down
to earth with a thump, as you think ‘oh this just makes me want to reread Misery’ or ‘man, I feel like watching The Birds now.’
The Dark Half was written by Stephen King and first
published by Viking Penguin in 1989.
No comments:
Post a Comment