![]() |
Image credit: Penguin Books Australia |
It’s true that, for many modern readers, books from the 1800s can prove
challenging, archaic, and sometimes downright unreadable. And while its
horrendously easy to cling to this literary attitude of ‘oh it’s too dense for
me’, I urge people to try and break themselves from it –especially those, like
me, who have a passion for literature, voyeurism, and the absorption of
knowledge and culture.
This train of thought and conclusive plea has come from my just
finishing my chosen book of the week: The
Scarlet Letter.
Set it in the fledgling, Puritan town of Boston New England, the book
tells the sad and sombre tale of Hester Prynne, a woman subjected to the
ridicule, ostracism, public defamation, and alienation of the community after
she has an affair and is made to wear a red A for ‘adulteress’ on her bosom.
Raising her illegitimate child, Pearl, alone and keeping the identity of her
fellow sinner a secret for fear of destroying his reputation and livelihood,
Hester’s life is made more perilous as her husband detects the guilty man and
makes it his mission to wreak vengeance upon him.
Despite its dated dialogue and lengthy, philosophically poetic prose, The Scarlet Letter is one of the most
loaded and complex books that I can recall reading. Hawthorne bombards his
readership with –seemingly- thousands of philosophical questions about the
nature of love, hate, faith, shame and, in doing so, opens the floodgates to
release a torrent of discussion.
![]() |
Image credit: IMDb |
The book does not merely chronicle a scandal, a secret love, and a
revenge story; it pushes the reader into wider, uncharted territories,
exploring the nature of people and communities. Setting the story in a newly
established village, it can be argued that the real saviour/villain of the
piece is change and evolution as is depicted by Hawthorne’s constant contrast
between various stages and depictions of people: adulthood vs. childhood with
Hester and Pearl, civilization vs. savagery with the Boston townsfolk and the
visiting native Indians who live in the forest, and tradition vs. human
instinct to change and adapt as is most prevalent in the scarlet letter
beginning the story as a symbol of shame, corruption, and degradation and
morphing into one of strength, woman’s unearthly compassion, and comfort.
It’s the changing attitudes of the characters on the page that makes The Scarlet Letter so impressive and, funnily enough, its conclusion holds a lot of relevance to this very day,
especially regarding the question of gender roles and the ever-raging battle of
the sexes. More than this, the book itself is a compelling and immersive read
that stimulates the entirety of the brain: the half that processes information
and stores it for discussion and argument, and the part that visualises worlds
and scenes and scenarios. It’s surprisingly good and easy to adapt to.
The Scarlet Letter was written by Nathaniel Hawthorne and first
published in America in 1850 by Ticknor, Reed & Fields.
No comments:
Post a Comment